Rhodes V Shulman et al NESARA case

Rhodes V Shulman et al NESARA case

DOUGLAS H. SHULMAN, et al., Defendants.

No. 1:10-CV-269.United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division.

November 30, 2010.


RUDY LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on: (1) Motion to Dismiss, filed by Defendants on September 13, 2010; (2) Motion to Continue, filed by Plaintiff on September 23, 2010; (3) Request Judges’ Counsel and to use Discretion Memorandum of Support, filed by Plaintiff on September 23, 2010; and (4) Motion for Case Not to be Dismissed, filed by Plaintiff on October 4, 2010. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and each of the Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. The Clerk is ORDERED to DISMISS this case without prejudice.


On August 11, 2010, Damaris June Rhodes filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, naming the following Defendants: (1) Douglas H. Shulman IRS Commissioner, Officially and Individually; (2) David A. Capp (aka) David Capp U.S. Attorney Officially and Individually; (3) Morrell John Berry (aka) John Berry OPM Director Officially and Individually; and (4) Office of Personal Management (aka) OPM and other named and named past and present officials, representatives, agents, and private consultants of the United States of America.

The complaint is twenty-one pages in length, and includes a variety of allegations. By way of example only, the complaint alleges the following:

(1) That Chief Justice John G. Roberts (a defendant in one of Rhodes‘ former lawsuits), together with other judges, “are hiding (concealing) their crimes against the American People behind silence Title 28 USC Sec 2403 and the ancient unconstitutional doctrine of sovereign immunity. Much U.S. Federal Corp. action has been dismantled in the Baskerville and Foster v. Credit Bank of Wichita, Federal Land Bank, and First Interstate Bank of Fort Collins 1993 (Baskerville Case).” (Complaint at 4-5).

(2) “By unconstitutional legislation, Americans are being separated from the Organic Constitution and Bill of Rights. All crimes committed remove the U.S. Federal Corp. officials so called sovereignty because crime removes sovereignty. Their activity was planned by the banks in the Banker’s Manifesto of 1892. This above case continues to unclothe their conduct against WE THE PEOPLE demonstrating the U.S. Federal Corp. only makes the appearance of being our government of, for and by the People is actually our deadly enemy easily proven as in Trading with the Enemy Act Title 50 Sec 1524; Title 42 Sec 2473 (Wars Act) doing daily damage to the People and earth by Chem-trails, vaccinations et al.” (Complaint at 5).

(3) That the IRS imposed an unlawful levy against Rhodes‘ property in the amount of $685.17, but Rhodes also noted that “[t]his is not about the amount or if it is paid or not.” (Complaint at 6).

(4) “They are using un-ratified 14th and 16th Amendments to rob the nation is to be proven by Discovery and already provide in the Baskerville Case held secret by Supreme Court gag order.” (Complaint at 6).

(5) “By unconstitutional legislation IRS caused damage by Mr. Kimmell bidding for my property for unconstitutional tax is an ever present wrongful act for multitudes of Americans.” (Complaint at 7).

(6) “Our Great Law is being slowly eroded and removed by legislation, using HAARP, Home Security, FEMA, CIA, war corporations and Federal agencies and other means using martial law at the location of take over. The Patriot Acts 1:11 and others they are using to defraud the people. I) Our help by a new constitutional Law N.E.S.A.R.A. is daily being withheld by not following lawful publishing procedure by Supreme Court’s wrongful acts of unlawful Orders and breaking their Oath of Office to protect U.S. Federal Corp profit and power on the home front and inter-national New World Order and permitting the Federal Reserve Bank to rule the nation unlawfully.” (Complaint at 8)

(7) “Roe v. Wade ruling oversteps the right of the Judges to make law instead of interrupting it according to its original meaning.” (Complaint at 8).

(8) “Toxic vaccines MMR, DPT, Avian swine flu shots for H1N1 virus and others are proven to be toxic causes of autism and H1N1 has a 15% death rate in Poland” and “Vaccination is what U.S. Federal Corp. does to their enemy by deciding the American People are their enemy. Vaccine has spiritual connotations contrary to the beliefs of spiritual people.” (Complaint at 8-9).

(9) “The CIA has done great damage to the American People within this country such as killing of leaders of integrity and on the international scene such as robbing Nicaragua et al which will bring them to war against us.” (Complaint at 9).

(10) “Seat belt laws are not for safety but revenue are legalized extortion.” (Complaint at 10).

(11) “Unconstitutional laws are being passed so fast to prepare for the annihilation of the nation’s People that there isn’t enough paper to inform the Court of the needed correction. They are wanting this land to become their wooded area so they can have it all prepared for their comfort after our demise.” (Complaint at 10).

Rhodes‘ request for relief spans from page 13 through 21 of the complaint, and includes a demand of well in excess of fifty million dollars for a variety of alleged harms. The relief section of the complaint seeks relief for, among other things, “U.S. Federal Corp. threats and acts of terrorism in conjunction with Israel and U.S. Federal Corp. activity on 9/11 and their policies with Palestinian politics false peace talks causing the actual attacks and continual media and Federal terrorist threat is to be stopped.” (Complaint at 14). Rhodes also seeks the injunctive relief of “[s]top meddling in other nations affairs by murdering the leaders of other nations et al.” (Complaint at 14). The relief section also requests that “Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) and Electronic Stalking and Mind Control (ESMC) are not to be used on People anywhere in any way” and “Stop neurotransmitters use for silent war against people.” (Complaint at 18).

Defendants seek to dismiss the instant complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, and also for lack of standing. The Defendants’ provided a notice to Plaintiff explaining the need to respond to the instant motion, and Plaintiff has responded. Defendants indicated that they did not intend to file a reply brief, outside of a short paragraph expressing Defendants’ understanding that a filing by Plaintiff titled “motion to continue” is not a request for additional time to do something, but a request to keep the case on the docket. The Plaintiff has confirmed this characterization. The matter is therefore fully briefed and ripe for adjudication.



Where defendants move to dismiss a case for both failure to state a claim and lack of standing, the Court is obligated to address the standing issue first. “Standing is `the threshold question in every federal case.'” American Civil Liberties Union, et. al., v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 2409907, *2, No. 75 C 3295 (N.D. Ill. July 31, 2009)(quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975). A motion to dismiss for lack of standing is considered under Federal Rule of Civil procedure 12(b)(1), which governs dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Id. Jurisdiction is the “power to decide” and must be conferred upon a federal court. In re Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R.R. Co., 794 F.2d 1182, 1188 (7th Cir. 1986). When the issue of standing is raised, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the jurisdiction requirements have been met. See United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Co., 322 F.3d 942, 946 (7th Cir. 2003); Kontos v. United States Dept. of Labor, 826 F.2d 573, 576 (7th Cir. 1987). In reviewing a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, the Court may look beyond the complaint and review any extraneous evidence submitted by the parties to determine whether subject matter jurisdiction exists. United Transp. Union v. Gateway Western R.R. Co., 78 F.3d 1208, 1210 (7th Cir. 1996).

Under the United States Constitution, a party must present a valid “case or controversy.” U.S. Const. Art. III § 2. The notion of standing is grounded in Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which restricts federal court adjudication to actual cases or controversies. Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 750 (1984). But “[s]tanding consists of both constitutional requirements, flowing from the Article III limitation on judicial power to `cases’ and `controversies,’ and prudential limitations on the exercise of federal jurisdiction. Rawoof v. Texor Petroleum Co., Inc., 521 F.3d 750, 761 (7th Cir. 2008).

A valid case or controversy is demonstrated by clearly alleging facts that he/she is a proper party to invoke judicial resolution of the dispute and it is presumed that federal courts lack jurisdiction unless the contrary appears affirmatively from the record. Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312, 316 (1991); Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 518 (1975). The “irreducible constitutional minimum of standing” contains three requirements. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992). First, there must be alleged (and ultimately proved) an “injury in fact”, a harm suffered by the plaintiff that is “concrete” and “actual or imminent, not `conjectural’ or `hypothetical.'” Steel v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 103 (1998). Second, there must be causation — a fairly traceable connection between the plaintiff’s injury and the complained-of conduct of the defendant. Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U.S. 26, 41-42 (1976); Bond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061, 1073 (7th Cir. 2009). And third, there must be redressability — a likelihood that the requested relief will redress the alleged injury. Simon, 426 U.S. at 45-46; Warth, 422 U.S. at 505. “This triad of injury in fact, causation, and redressability constitutes the core of Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement, and the party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing its existence.” Steel Co., 523 U.S. at 103-04 (citing FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 231 (1990).

The instant complaint is framed as a class action suit. The assertion that the suit is a class action does not affect this Court’s standing analysis. “That a suit may be a class action adds nothing to the question of standing, for even named plaintiffs who represent a class must allege and show that they personally have been injured, not that injury has been suffered by other, unidentified members of the class to which they belong and which they purport to represent.” Simon, 426 U.S. at 26.

The harms Rhodes complains of are harms that Rhodes believes all citizens are suffering. For example, Rhodes states that “[t]he unconstitutional and illegal tax law and their collection has given the Federal government power to abuse the People and myself in every form possible in agreement with the Banker’s Manifesto. It has deprived me of money, house, business and the nutritional needs for health and comforts of life.” (Dismissal Response and Request Case be Continued, at 2). Similarly, Rhodes complains of harm from drinking and bathing in water treated with fluoride. (Dismissal Response and Request Case be Continued, at 7). These broad-reaching harms are not pled with any detail, and are more speculative than concrete. The only actual injury that is pled with any specificity by Rhodes is the imposition of a tax levy, but as to that injury, Rhodes noted that “[t]his is not about the amount or if it is paid or not.” (Complaint at 6). It appears that Rhodes does not intend this suit to be an attack on the imposition of the tax levy, but an attack of the general principals of law that would allow such a levy, and many other laws as well. The harms Rhodes complains of are both hypothetical and conjectural, and are not the sorts of actual or imminent injuries that result in standing. Rhodes wholly fails to address a traceable connection between the harms alleged and the acts of the Defendants. And, the harms Rhodes alleges can not be redressed by this court.

Even if Rhodes had demonstrated the constitutional minimum requirements for standing, prudential principles of standing would bar Rhodes‘ claim. Prudential principles bar “adjudication of generalized grievances more appropriately addressed in the representative branches.” See Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984); see also Warth, 422 U.S. at 499 (“[W]hen the asserted harm is a `generalized grievance’ shared in substantially equal measure by all or a large class of citizens, that harm alone normally does not warrant exercise of jurisdiction.”). Rhodes is attempting to sue based on general harm to the public, not specific harm to her. Rhodes‘ critiques of law and society are better addressed to the legislature than this Court.

Having found that Rhodes lacks standing, this Court must now address whether the dismissal of Rhodes‘ claims should be with or without prejudice. The Defendants suggests in one of their headings that the dismissal should be with prejudice, but offers little to support this suggestion. This Court’s research suggests that dismissal without prejudice is more appropriate, as a dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) is not an adjudication on the merits. See Winslow v. Walters, 815 F.2d 1114 (7th Cir. 1987)(“[A] ruling granting a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not on the merits; its res judicata effect is limited to the question of jurisdiction.”); see also University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc., 569 F.3d 1328, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (“A dismissal for lack of standing is jurisdictional and is not an adjudication on the merits.”).

Failure to State a Claim

Because this Court has determined that standing is lacking, it need not consider the Defendants arguments pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In fact, because this Court lacks jurisdiction, to do so would be inappropriate. See Yellowtail v. Little Horn State Bank, 828 F.Supp. 780, 783 (D. Mont. 1992)(Standing is “a threshold test that must be satisfied… even before considering whether the plaintiff has adequately pled a federal cause of action.”).


For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. The Clerk is ORDERED to DISMISS this case without prejudice.

Nancy B. Detweiler: History of NESARA

2011 August 17
by Steve Beckow
Nancy Detweiler has produced a year-by-year history of NESARA. The amount of work involved must have been enormous. I don’t expect everyone to read the whole article, but it can serve as a reference. I’ll create a page for it as well as this post.

Nancy has asked that the following intro be added to this article:
NOTE: Writing a history of NESARA requires locating the separate dots and attempting to put them together to create truth. The original documents are sequestered and those individuals directly involved are still under a strict gag order.
I have used as my foundation a history written by James Rink. My research set out to prove NESARA by locating original documents and articles written by reputable people that illustrated each of the tenets. I have inserted some of these URLs for these tenets into Rink’s history. In my 7+ years of research, I have found nothing to disprove the existence of the NESARA LAW. The internet is loaded with disinformation that can be easily dismissed by research.
Now that information regarding the government/military cover-up of the extraterrestrial presence is in the public domain, we can see parallels of the facets regarding NESARA that many have used to discredit it. Some of these are: deliberate cover-up of information, government/military gag orders, the suspicious death of persons who attempted to tell the truth, control of the media, and the ruining of individual lives and professions.
I encourage all to do your own research and add to the pool of documented evidence on the truth of NESARA.
Now is the perfect time for NESARA to be released to the world!


The National Economic Security & Reformation Act
Compiled by Nancy Detweiler, M.Ed., M.Div., Aug. 17, 2011
1892 – Bankers adopted their Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892 in which it was declared: “We [the bankers] must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them….
The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.”
1907-1917 – In order to warn Americans, the1892 Bankers’ Manifesto was revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917.
1910 – John E. DiNardo, professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan, writes in his article “The Federal Reserve Act”: “On the night of November 22, 1910, a small group of surrogates of the most powerful bankers of the World met … under the veil of utmost secrecy.
Over the next few weeks these men would perpetrate, under the orders of their masters, … perhaps the most colossal and devastating fraud ever inflicted upon the American People.
This ultra-secret fraud is known as the Federal Reserve Act of 1913…. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 concocted legislation, to be foisted upon the People’s Congress of the United States, that empowered and commissioned this secret cabal of World-dominant bankers to PRINT UNITED STATES CURRENCY, a usurpation of our Constitution’s explicit edict empowering ONLY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT to print and coin currency. This world banking empire used their stolen power to print, out of thin air, paper currency which, in no way represents the gold and silver reserves that authentic currency is supposed to represent.”
1913 – The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 Complete text of Act may seen at: http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/files/105/FRA-LH-PL63-43.pdf
1933 – 1934Prior to 1933, Federal Reserve Notes were backed by gold. This changed with the new law: Congressional Record, March 9, 1933 on HR 1491 p. 83. “Under the new law the money is issued to the banks in return for government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and bankers acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes, and other property of all the people of the nation.”
The Bankers’ Manifesto ties in with the U.S. Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session (1934), which states: “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called ‘ownership’ is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere ‘user’ and use must be in acceptance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”
1970s – The Federal Land Bank illegally foreclosed on farmers mortgages all throughout the Midwest. In each of these cases the farmers were defrauded by the banks with the approval of the Federal Reserve System. These court cases would eventually become known as the Farmer Claims Program.
1978 – An elderly ranch farmer in Colorado purchased a farm with loan from the Federal Land Bank. After he died the property was passed on to his son Roy Schwasinger, Jr., who was a retired military general. Soon after a Federal Land Bank officer and Federal Marshall appeared on his property and informed him the bank was foreclosing on his farm, ordering him to vacate within 30 days. Without his knowledge, his deceased father had signed a stipulation which reverted the property back to the Federal Land Bank in the event of the borrower’s death.
Outraged, Roy E. Schwasinger, Jr. filed a class action lawsuit in the Denver Federal Court system. The suit was dismissed on the basis of incorrect filing. This prompted Roy Schwasinger’s investigation into the inner workings of the banking system.
1982 – Roy Schwasinger was given a contract by the US senate and later Supreme Court to investigate banking fraud. But because he was under a strict non-disclosure order he was not allowed to tell the media what he discovered. In the late 80s he began sharing his knowledge with others including high ranking military personnel who helped him bring about a class action lawsuit against the federal government.
The first series of these lawsuits began in the mid 1980’s when William and Shirley Baskerville of Fort Collins, Colorado were involved in a bankruptcy case with First Interstate Bank of Fort Collins; who was trying to foreclose on their farm. At a restaurant their lawyer informed them that he would no longer be able to help them and walked-off. Overhearing the conversation Roy Schwasinger offered his advice on how to appeal the case in bankruptcy court. So in 1987 they filed an appeal (Case No. 87-C-716) with the United States District Court in Colorado.
1988 – On November 3, 1988, the Denver Federal Court system ruled that indeed the banks had defrauded the Baskervilles and proceeded to reverse its bankruptcy decision. But when the foreclosed property was not returned they filed a new lawsuit. Eventually, 23 other farmers, ranchers, and Indians swindled by the banks in the same manner would join in the case.
In these cases, the banks were foreclosing on the properties using fraudulent methods such as charging exorbitant interest, illegal foreclosure, or by not crediting mortgage payments to their account as they should have but instead would steal the mortgage payments for themselves triggering foreclosure on the property. After running out of money they continued their fight without the help of lawyers. With some assistance by the Farmers Union a new lawsuit was filed against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. Case No. 92-C-1781
The District Court ruled in their favor and ordered the banks to return the stolen properties with help from either Federal Marshals or the National Guard. But when no payments were made, the farmers declared involuntary Chapter Seven Bankruptcy against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. The banks appealed their case insisting they were not a business but a federal agency therefore they were not liable to pay the damages.
So the farmer’s legal team adopted a new strategy. According to the Federal Land Bank’s 1933 charter they are not allowed to make loans directly to applicants, but instead could only back loans as a guarantor in case of default. Because the Federal Land Bank had violated this rule the farmer’s legal team was able to successfully sue the bank for damages.
Word of the lawsuit began to spread; the legal team would teach others how to fight foreclosure and to help them file lawsuits as well (Case No. 93-1308-M). Celebrities such as Willie Nelson joined in the cause and helped raise money during his “Farm Aid” concerts.
The Baskerville case had now become the Farmer Claims Class Action Lawsuit. Worried about the legal ramifications the government retaliated against the farmers by hitting them with either outrageous IRS fees, or by imprisoning the legal team under frivolous nonrelated charges. When the farmers realized they were being unfairly targeted, they had military generals such as General Roy Schwasinger sit in the courtroom to make sure the bribed judges would vote according to constitutional law.
The farmers now with a large team of knowledgeable people of the law behind them filed a new case to claim additional damages from the fraudulent loaning activities of the Farmers Credit System.
The government tried to settle but they had already lost many cases and were now loosing the appeals as well. More and more evidence was collected. According to the National Banking Act all banks are required to register their charters with the Federal and State Bureau of Records, but none of the banks complied, allowing the legal team to sue the Farmers Credit System. Not only was Farmers Credit System not chartered to do business with the American Banking Association, but so were other quasi government organizations such as the Federal Housing Administration, The Department of Housing and Urban Development, and even the Federal Reserve Bank.
The Farmers Claims lawsuit was thrown out of court at each level with the records purposely destroyed. An example of these court cases may be viewed at: http://openjurist.org/25/f3d/1055/baskerville-jb-v-federal-land-bank-na
1990s – In the early 1990’s Roy Schwasinger brought the case before the United States Supreme Court. Some of the content of this case is sealed from public eyes but most of it can be viewed today.
The U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruled that the Farmers Union claims were indeed valid, therefore, all property foreclosed by the Farmers Credit System was illegal and all those who were foreclosed on would have to receive damages. In addition, they ruled that the U.S. federal government and banks had defrauded the farmers, and all U.S. citizens, out of vast sums of money and property.
Furthermore, the court ruled the shocking truth that the IRS was a Puerto Rican Trust. Read more at: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
In addition the court ruled that the Federal Reserve was unlawful: http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/frcourt.html
That the income tax amendment was only ratified by four states and therefore was not a legal amendment, that the IRS code was not enacted into “Positive Law” within the Code of Federal Regulations. Positive Law = Laws that have been enacted by a properly instituted and recognized branch of the government. http://www.givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/notratified.htm
That the U.S. government illegally foreclosed on farmer’s homes with help from federal agencies. Irrefutable proof was presented by a retired CIA agent. He provided testimony and records of the banks illegal activities as further evidence that the Farmers’ Union claims were indeed legitimate. The implications of such a decision were profound. All gold, silver, and property titles, taken by the Federal Reserve and IRS must be returned to the people.
The legal team sought assistance from a small group of benevolent visionaries, consisting of politicians, military generals, and business people who have been secretly working to restore the constitution since the mid 1950’s. Somehow within their ranks, a four star U.S. army general received “title” and “receiver” of the original 1933 United States Bankruptcy.
When the case was brought before the U.S. Supreme Court, they ruled in his favor, giving the Army General title over the United States, Inc. Legal action was then passed on to the Senate Finance Committee and Senator Sam Nunn, who was working with Roy Schwasinger.
1991 – With the help of covert congressional and political pressure, President George H.W. Bush issued an Executive Order on Oct. 23, 1991, which provided a provision allowing anyone who has a claim against the federal government to receive payment as long as it’s within the rules of the original format of the case. You may read Executive Order No. 12778 at the URL below.
Executive Order No. 12778 Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees; October 23, 1991
According to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, all present and succeeding debts against the U.S. Treasury must be assumed by the Federal Reserve. Thus the famer’s claims legal team was able to use that executive order to not only force the Federal Reserve to pay out damages in a gold backed currency but also allow them to receive legal ownership over the bankruptcy of United States, Inc.
To collect damages the farmers legal team used an obscure attachment to the 14th amendment which most people are not aware of. After the civil war the government allowed citizens to claim a payment on anyone who suffered damages as a result of the Federal Government failing to protect its citizens from harm or damages by a foreign government. President Grant had this attachment sealed from public eyes but somehow, someone on the farmer’s legal team got a hold of it.
If you read that carefully, it specifies damages by a foreign government. That foreign government is the corporate federal government which has been masquerading to the public as the constitutional government. See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/813840/posts for explanations.
Remember this goes back to the Organic Act of 1871 and the Trading with the Enemies Act of 1933, which defined all citizens as enemy combatants under the federal system known as the United States. The Justices and farmer’s legal team recognized how evil and corrupt our federal government had become and to counteract this they added some provisions in the settlement to bring the government back under control.
a. First they would have to be paid using a lawful currency, backed by gold and silver as the constitution dictates. This would eliminate inflation and gyrating economic cycles created by the Federal Reserve System. See Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution.
b. Second they would be required to go back to common law instead of admiralty law under the gold fringe flags. Under common law if there is no damage or harm done then there is no violation of the law. This would eliminate millions of laws which are used to control the masses and protect corrupt politicians.
c. Lastly the IRS would have to be dismantled and replaced with a national sales tax. This is the basis of the NESARA Law.
When the legal team finally settled on a figure, each individual would receive an average of $20 million dollars payout per claim. Multiplied by a total of 336,000 claims that were filed against the U.S. Federal Government, the total payout would come out to a staggering $6.6 trillion dollars.
The U.S. Supreme Court placed a gag order on the case, struck all information from the Federal Registry, and placed all records in the Supreme Court files. Up to that point Senator Sam Nunn had kept the Baskerville Case records within his office. A settlement was agreed to out of court and the decision was sealed by Janet Reno. Because the case was sealed, claimants are not allowed to share court documents to media outlets without violating the settlement, but they can still tell others about the lawsuit. This is why you probably have not heard about this.
1991 – Roy Schwasinger went before a senate committee to present evidence of the banks and governments criminal activity. He informed them how the Corporation of the United States was tied to the establishment of a New World Order which would bring about a fascist one world government ruled by the international bankers.
1992 – A task force was put together consisting of over 300 retired and 35 active US military officers who strongly supported constitutional law.* This task force was responsible for investigating governmental officials, congressional officers, judges, and the Federal Reserve.
*Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jeremy Boorda
*General David McCloud
*Former Director of Central Intelligence, William Colby
They uncovered the common practice of bribery and extortion committed by both senators and judges. The criminal activity was so rampant that only 2 out of 535 members of congress were deemed honest. But more importantly they carried out the first ever audit of the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve was accustomed to giving orders to politicians and had no intentions of being audited. However after they were informed their offices would be raided under military gunpoint if necessary; they complied with the investigation. After reviewing their files the military officers found $800 trillion dollars sitting in accounts which should have been applied to the national debt. And contrary to federal government propaganda they also discovered that most nations had in fact owed money to the United States instead of the other way around.
These hidden trillions were then confiscated and placed into European bank accounts in order to generate the enormous funds needed to pay the farmers claims class action lawsuit. Later this money would become the basis of the prosperity programs.
Despite these death blows President George H.W. Bush and the illuminati continued on with their plans of global enslavement.
1992 – In August 1992 the military officers confronted President Bush and demanded he sign agreement that he would return the United States to constitutional law and ordered him to never use the term New World Order again. Bush pretended to cooperate but secretly planned to bring about the New World Order anyway by signing an Executive Order on December 25, 1992, that would have indefinitely closed all banks giving Bush an excuse to declare martial law.
Under the chaos of martial law, Bush intended to install a new constitution which would have kept everyone currently in office in their same position for 25 years and it would have removed all rights to elect new officials. The military intervened and stopped Bush from signing that Executive order.
1993 – In 1993 members of the Supreme Court, certain members of congress and representatives from the Clinton government meet with high ranking US military officers who were demanding a return to constitutional law, reforms of the banking system, and financial redress. They agreed to create the farm claims process which would allow the legal team to set up meetings all over the country on a grass roots level to help others file claims and to educate them about the lawsuit.
A claim of harm could be made on any loan issued by a financial institution for all interest paid; foreclosures; attorney and court fees; IRS taxes or liens; real estate and property taxes; mental and emotional stress caused by the loss of property; stress related illness such as suicide and divorce; and even warrants, incarceration, and probation could also be claimed.
1994 – But the Clinton government undermined their efforts by requiring the farm claims to use a specific form designed by the government. This form imposed an administrative fee of $300 for each claim, which was later used in 1994 as a basis to arrest the leaders of the legal team including Roy Schwasinger.
The government was so afraid of what they would say during their trial in Michigan that extra steps were taken to conceal the true nature of the case. County courthouse employees were not allowed to work between Monday and Thursday during the course of the trial. And outside the courthouse, FBI agents swarmed the perimeter preventing the media and visitors from learning what was going on as well.
Harassment and retaliation by the government increased, many where sent prison or murdered while incarcerated. Despite being protected by his military personnel the army general who acquired the original 1933 Title of Bankruptcy of the United States; was imprisoned, killed, and replaced with a clone. This clone was then used as a decoy to prevent any further claims from being filed. (I am not qualified to speak on the fact of human clones; however, that they exist is a fairly widely accepted fact among those who study behind the scenes activities. You may read more at: http://www.questacon.edu.au/indepth/cloning/arguments_against_cloning.html Don’t allow the thought of clones running the government cause you to refuse to consider the veracity of this history. As truth emerges, we will be shocked at much we hear.
During the first Clinton administration the military delayed many of Clinton’s federal appointments until they were sure these individuals would help restore constitutional law. One such individual who promised to bring about the necessary changes was Attorney General Janet Reno.
1993 – In agreement with the Supreme Court ruling on June 3, 1993, Janet Reno ordered the Delta Force and Navy Seals to Switzerland, England, and Israel to recapture trillions of dollars of gold stolen by the Federal Reserve System from the strategic gold reserves. These nations cooperated with the raid because they were promised their debts owed to the United States would be canceled and because the people who stole the money from the United States also stole money from their nations as well.
This bullion is to be used for the new currency backed by precious metals. It’s now safely stockpiled at the Norad Complex at Colorado Springs, Colorado and four other repositories. Janet Reno’s action so enraged the powers-that-be, that it resulted in her death. She was then replaced with a clone and it was this creature that was responsible for covering-up the various Clinton scandals.
To keep the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Robert Rubin in line, he too was also cloned. For the remainder of their term in office both Reno and Rubin received their salaries from the International Monetary Fund as foreign agents and not from the U.S. Treasury. Despite these actions the legal team continued on with their fight while managing to avoid bloodshed and a major revolution.
After 1993 the farmer claims process name was changed to Bank Claims. Between 1993 and 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court required U.S. citizens to file “Bank Claims” to collect damages paid by the U.S. Treasury Department. This process CLOSED in 1996.
During this time the U.S. Supreme Court assigned one or more Justices to monitor the progress of the rulings. They enlisted help of experts in economics, monetary systems, banking, constitutional government and law, and many other related areas. These justices built coalitions of support and assistance with thousands of people worldwide; known as “White Knights.” The term ‘White Knights’ was borrowed from the world of big business. It refers to a vulnerable company that is rescued from a hostile takeover by a corporation or a wealthy person—a White Knight.
To implement the required changes, the five Justices spent years negotiating how the reformations would occur. Eventually they settled on certain agreements, also known as Accords, with the U.S. government, the Federal Reserve Bank owners, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and with numerous other countries including the United Kingdom and countries of the Euro Zone. Because these U.S. banking reformations will impact the entire world; the IMF, World Bank, and other countries had to be involved. The reformations require that the Federal Reserve be absorbed by the U.S. Treasury Department and the banks’ fraudulent activities must be stopped and payment must be made for past harm.
1998 – The military generals who originally participated in the famer’s claim process realized that the US Supreme Court justices had no intentions of implementing the Accords. So they decided the only way to implement the reformations was through a law passed by congress.
1999 – A 75 page document known as the National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA) was submitted to congress where it sat with little action for almost a year.
2000Late one evening on March 9, 2000, a written quorum call was hand-delivered by Delta Force and Navy SEALs to 15 members of the US Senate and the US House who were sponsors and co-sponsors of NESARA. They were immediately escorted by the Delta Force and Navy SEALs to their respective voting chambers where they passed the National Economic Security and Reformation Act.
These 15 members of congress were the only people lawfully allowed to hold office in accordance with the original 13th amendment. Remember British soldiers destroyed copies of the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) in the war of 1812 because it prevented anyone who had ties to the crown of England from holding public office.
NESARA is the most ground breaking reformation to sweep not only this country but our planet in its entire history. The act does away with the Federal Reserve Bank, the IRS, the shadow government, and much more.
NESARA implements the following changes:
1. Zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt.
2. Abolishes the income tax.
3. Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area.
4. Creates a 14% flat rate non-essential new items only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed; nor will used items such as old homes.
5. Increases benefits to senior citizens.
6. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters.
7. Reinstates the original Title of Nobility amendment.
8. Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA’s announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law.
9. Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups.
10. Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933.
11. Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation.
12. Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law
13. Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side of the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply.
14. Restores financial privacy.
15. Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law.
16. Ceases all aggressive, U.S. government military actions worldwide.
17. Establishes peace throughout the world.
18. Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes.
19. Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, antigravity, and sonic healing machines.
October 10, 2000 – Because President Clinton’s clone had no interest in signing NESARA into law on October 10, 2000; under orders from U.S. military generals, the elite Naval Seals and Delta Force stormed the White House and under gunpoint forced Bill Clinton to sign NESARA. During this time Secret Service and White House security personnel were ordered to stand down, disarmed, and allowed to witness this event under a gag order.
From its very inception Bush Sr., the corporate government, major bank houses, and the Carlyle group have opposed NESARA. To maintain secrecy, the case details and the docket number were sealed and revised within the official congressional registry, to reflect a commemorative coin and then again it was revised even more recently. This is why there are no public Congressional Records and why a search for this law will not yield the correct details until after the reformations are made public.
Members of congress will not reveal NESARA because they have been ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices to deny its existence or face charges of treason punishable by death. Some members of Congress have actually been charged with obstruction. When Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone was about to break the gag order, his small passenger plane crashed killing his wife, daughter, and himself.
If fear isn’t enough to keep Washington in line, money is. Routine bribes are offered to governmental/military officials by the power elite/secret government.
Not surprisingly, much disinformation about NESARA can be found on the internet. Wikipedia’s article is total disinformation. Dr. Harvey Francis Barnard’s NESARA bill—National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act was rejected by congress in the 1990s. Dr. Barnard was a systems philosopher and had tried for years to interest Congress in his monetary reform suggestions. A testimony by Dr. Barnard’s close friend, Darrell Anderson, may be read at: http://www.simpleliberty.org/bookshelf/draining_the_swamp.htm You may also read articles by Darrell Anderson at this site. Both men were interested in monetary reform.
September 11, 2001 – The next step is to announce NESARA to the world, but it’s not an easy task. Many powerful groups have tried to prevent the implementation of NESARA.
The NESARA law requires that at least once a year, an effort be made to announce the law to the public. Three then current US Supreme Court judges control the committee in charge of NESARA’s announcement. These Judges have used their overall authority to secretly sabotage NESARA’s announcement.
In 2001 after much negotiation the Supreme Court justices ordered the 107th Congress to pass resolutions approving‘ NESARA. This took place on September 9, 2001, eighteen months after NESARA became law. On September 10, 2001, George Bush Sr. moved into the White house to steer his son on how to block the announcement. The next day, on September 11, 2001, at 10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Alan Greenspan was scheduled to announce the new US Treasury Bank system, debt forgiveness for all U.S. citizens, and abolishment of the IRS as the first part of the public announcements of NESARA.
Just before the announcement at 9 am, Bush Sr. ordered the demolition of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers to stop the international banking computers on Floors 1and 2 in the North Tower from initiating the new U.S. Treasury Bank system. Explosives in the World Trade Center were planted by operatives and detonated remotely in Building 7, which was demolished later that day in order to cover-up their crime.
Remote pilot technology was used in a flyover event to deliver a payload of explosives into the Pentagon at the exact location of the White Knights in their new Naval Command Center who were coordinating activities supporting NESARA’s implementation nationwide. With the announcement of NESARA stopped dead in its tracks, George Bush Sr. decapitated any hopes of returning the government back to the people.
For the past 10 years, life in the USA, and numerous other countries, has been dictated by the staged terrorist’ attack and its repercussions. Seldom does a day go by that we do not hear mention of 9/11.
2005 – Dr. Harvey F. Barnard died on May 18, 2005. http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/newssdi?sn=Barnard&fn=Harvey&nt=exact
2009 – Roy E. Schwasinger, Jr. died on 8/23/2009 at the age of 75. Verification – Social Security Death Index at:
2011 – The Debt Ceiling debacle kindled re-newed interest in NESARA. As we watch the world economy collapse, we can know that the NESARA LAW remains in the background, ready to be announced.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s